Friday April 05, 1pm to 4pm. SSB 201/203
1:00 pm Welcome by Provost/CAT Director
1:15pm – 2:15pm: Poster Session PA
Brittany Kraft,
Biological Sciences,
“Cheat Sheets Incentivize Studying”
Yeimy Roberto,
Modern Languages and Linguistics,
“Exploring Compositions in Second Language Classes: A Comparative Analysis of Computer vs. Paper-Based Writing”
Quantitative measures include assessments of writing content, organization, vocabulary, and overall grammar, utilizing established rubrics. Additionally, qualitative data are collected through participant surveys and interviews, exploring learners’ perceptions, preferences, and attitudes towards composing in Spanish using different mediums.
It is expected to find specifics of the various aspects of writing performance that impact intermediate second-language learners of Spanish. While both groups might demonstrate similar proficiency levels in certain areas, such as grammatical accuracy and vocabulary usage, disparities in writing fluency, organization, and revision practices are anticipated. Furthermore, learners’ attitudes towards composing digitally versus on paper will provide key aspects to consider when the goal of our classes is based on a learner-centered design framework.
This study contributes to understanding the intersection between technology, language learning, and writing proficiency. The findings have implications for educators and curriculum developers, informing decisions regarding the integration of digital tools in second-language writing instruction. By recognizing the strengths and limitations of different mediums, educators can tailor instructional approaches to meet the diverse needs of language learners better, ultimately enhancing their overall proficiency and language acquisition experiences.
Billy Bean, Alysia Roehrig,
Educational Psychology and Learning Systems,
“Lessons Learned from Teaching “College Teaching in Higher Education” and a Content Analysis of Syllabi in Sport Psychology”
Michael Furman,
Honors Program,
“Honors Innovations: Board Games as Public History”
Kristen Guynes,
School of Communication Science and Disorders,
“Specifications Based Grading for Language Learning”
Jessica Simon,
Office of STEM Teaching,
“Using the learning cycle in a 6-week “Abnormal” Psychology course”
Derek Vasquez, Shayne McConomy, Camilo Ordonez,
Mechanical Engineering,
“Cross Curricular Projects to Reduce Cognitive Workload”
1:15pm – 2:00pm: Roundtable Discussions Session RA
Sharanya Jayaraman,
Computer Science,
“Fostering a Growth Mindset in Introductory STEM Courses: Lessons Learned and Future Directions”
Our discussion will explore the practical aspects of implementing this approach, including the role of practice, feedback, and self-reflection in nurturing a growth mindset among students. We will also discuss strategies for overcoming challenges and resistance to change, drawing from real-world examples and experiences.
Furthermore, we aim to expand the conversation beyond computer science education to explore how similar methodologies could be applied to other STEM disciplines. By sharing our insights and experiences, we hope to inspire educators to rethink their teaching paradigms and empower students to embrace a mindset of continuous growth and improvement in their chosen fields.
Join us as we explore the transformative power of a growth mindset in STEM education and beyond.
Leah Hollingsworth, Kris Bowers, Courtney Simmons, Pene Kirby,
Mathematics,
“Math + Active Learning = Results”
Megan Buning,
FSU COACH Interdisciplinary Center,
“Teaching Using Teams in Research Courses”
Meg Nelson,
Theater and Performance Research,
“Accessibility In The Classroom”
In this roundtable discussion, I wish to explore the following questions with fellow educators:
- what sort of attendance/tardy policies do we have for sickness in the classroom?
- do you require a doctor’s note?
- how do we mitigate financial differences within our student body if students do not have the means of getting (i.e. adequate transportation) to their appointment or affording the co-pay that an appointment requires?
- in thinking about our answers to the above questions, how do we mitigate the need for students who are not covered/affiliated by/with OAS who may need additional time/absences due to mental health-related reasons? How can we promote a culture of trust between us, as educators, and our students while also making sure that learning and engagement with material is our number one priority?
Yanyu Pan, Genna Boyd,
Undergraduate Studies,
“Cultivating Self-Regulated Learners: Strategies and Insights from SLS1122”
Through practical examples and shared experiences, we will discuss methods to incorporate academic planning (e.g., course goal setting, time-management) exercises and study-strategy workshops (e.g., active reading, exam preparation, self-assessment journal) into various curricula. Additionally, the session will highlight the importance of nurturing soft skills like communication and emotional intelligence (e.g., help-seeking behavior, stress management, etc.) that are crucial for students’ overall success. Participants will be encouraged to delve into how these strategies can be seamlessly integrated into their courses, promoting a learner-centered environment that empowers students to take control of their educational journey.
This roundtable is designed as a collaborative forum for educators to exchange ideas and practices, with the aim of inspiring a shift towards a more inclusive and effective educational paradigm. By integrating SLS 1122 strategies into diverse teaching contexts, we can collectively enhance the capacity of students to become self-regulated learners and equip them with the skills necessary to navigate their academic and future professional challenges with confidence.
2:00 – 2:45pm: Roundtable Descussions Session RB
David King,
Management,
“Teaching online and hybrid courses”
Jennifer Grill,
English for Academic Purposes Program, Center for Intensive English Studies,
“Helping Graduate Students Write Successfully in Their Disciplines”
Craig Stanley III, Tomi Gomory,
Social Work,
“Improving the Student Educational Experience Using Feedback Informed Teaching”
Brian Foster,
Educational Psychology and Learning Systems,
“Facilitating Self-Determined Learning Via Student-Generated Discussion Questions”
Warren Oliver, Ashley Krutz-Ordner,
Center for Undergraduate Research and Academic Engagement,
“’Are you sure?’ Discussing ‘risk’ in experiential education and how FSU’s Global Scholars Program supports undergraduate students in independent internships”
- Risk to themselves (with regards to their own safety)
- Risk to their host community (with regards to ethical community engagement)
- Risk dependent on their situation (i.e. “looking for” vs “doing” vs “building on” independent internship experiences)
- Risk inherent to the setting (domestically vs. international experiences)
FSU’s Global Scholars program supports students in this process by not only informing students of such risks, but also encouraging students to reflect on their own potential experiences to establish the relevance of the types of risk inherent within their potential experiences as well as how to potentially mitigate such risk. Additionally, because of this complex nature, this program often collaborates with other entities on campus–namely the Career Center and the Director of Travel Safety and Risk.
This round table will discuss how the program collaboratively addresses these concepts of risk to aid students’ preparation for an independent internship. Then a student panel of program alumni will highlight these concepts within their experiences within independent internships–both within the US and abroad. Attendees should come away from this discussion with a more nuanced conceptualization of risk within experiential educational opportunities–particularly how this concept changes and remains the same within domestic and international settings–as well as how a program can help support students as they prepare for independent internship experiences.
2:30pm – 3:30pm: Poster Session PB
Christopher Mills, Sharanya Jayaraman,
Computer Science,
“Leveraging Undergraduate Learning Assistants to Enhance Engagement and Resilience in Introductory Computer Science Courses”
The impact of this initiative has been substantial. Student engagement and participation in course activities have significantly increased, creating a more vibrant and interactive learning environment. Furthermore, retention rates and overall performance in the courses have improved, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing student success.
Through this poster, we aim to showcase the benefits of integrating LAs into introductory computer science courses and provide insights for educators looking to implement similar programs in their classrooms. Join us as we explore how leveraging LAs can transform the learning experience and empower students to succeed in challenging academic disciplines.
Leah Hollingsworth,
Mathematics,
“Investigating the Role of Math Attitudes among Undergraduate Students in a College Algebra Course”
Courtney Simmons, Penelope Kirby,
Mathematics,
“Calculus I at FSU: Improving Student Success through Research-Informed Redesign”
This poster highlights the mathematics department’s systematic approach to reforming our Calculus I course, underlining our dedication to teaching excellence. The initial reduction in DFW rates suggests these strategies are effectively supporting student success, but we recognize the journey doesn’t end here. We will persist in evaluating and enhancing our pedagogy to maintain momentum and ensure lasting benefits for future students.
Rebecca Vasile,
School of Teacher Education,
“The connection between early literacy and reading acquisition: What do preservice teachers know?”
Danielle Morsching,
School of Teacher Education,
“Using Guided Notes to Create a Practitioner Toolkit”
Debbie Slik,
Florida Center for Reading Research/College of Education,
“An Examination of the Teaching of Oral Language Development in Reading for Understanding Courses”
The overarching goal of this study is to identify and address potential gaps in the integration of oral language practices into future coursework. By disseminating the findings to faculty members responsible for teaching reading endorsement courses, this research aims to empower them to refine their instructional approaches.
Stephanie Dillon,
Chemistry and Biochemistry,
“Using an Active Learning Classroom Program to Improve Grades and Retention”
3:00pm – 3:45pm: Roundtable Discussions Session RC
Laura Biagi,
English,
“Using Games to Improve Student Learning and Participation”
Another challenge was how to encourage more students, including introverted students, to participate in discussion. In literature, creative writing, and composition classrooms, I have begun incorporating a plush toy football that signals the “speaker.” We start using it on the first day in an icebreaker activity. Then, during discussions, one student initially volunteers for the ball, then has the power to throw it to whomever they would like next. This empowers more students to speak and prioritizes students as discussion leaders. It incorporates kinesthetic learning and puts less pressure on discussions, as the ball often serves as humorous subject. Students who initially expressed concern about speaking up in class spoke up more with the ball, and classroom discussion increased overall compared to prior semesters.
Deanna Barath,
Public Health,
“Participation for preparation”
The impact of these changes has substantial, with average exam scores experiencing a notable surge of 15 percentage points. This improvement underscores the effectiveness of active student involvement in augmenting academic performance.
Furthermore, this enhancement in engagement has enabled a reconfiguration of in-class activities and discussions. With a solid foundation of understanding established through pre-class interactions and post-class assessments, instructional sessions can now be tailored to delve deeper into key concepts and refine students’ comprehension of learning objectives.
This transformative approach not only elevates academic achievement but also fosters a dynamic learning environment where students are actively invested in their intellectual growth. By leveraging participation incentives and strategic assessments, educators can cultivate a culture of engagement that maximizes the educational experience for all stakeholders.